Mihir Mehta <mi...@cs.utexas.edu> writes: > The file namei.c seems to have been renamed to namei_msdos.c, so I > decided to update the comment with the correct name, and expand it a bit > to tell the reader what to look for. > --- > fs/fat/dir.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c > index 7f5f369..f4db13f 100644 > --- a/fs/fat/dir.c > +++ b/fs/fat/dir.c > @@ -369,7 +369,9 @@ static int fat_parse_short(struct super_block *sb, > } > > memcpy(work, de->name, sizeof(work)); > - /* see namei.c, msdos_format_name */ > + /* For an explanation of the special treatment of 0x05 in > + * filenames, see msdos_format_name in namei_msdos.c > + */ > if (work[0] == 0x05) > work[0] = 0xE5;
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>
