Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 23:48 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> > > On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:32 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > > I'm not sure why this can't be made atomic, but assuming, that it
> > > > > can't, fuse should still not need to be implicated. If it is,
> > > > that's
> > > > > an indication about something wrong in the suspend procedure.
> > > >
> > > > Nope, something's wrong in fuse. You must be able to deal with sync
> > > > until every task is frozen.
> > >
> > > Pipe dream
> >
> > Then tell me how you want to avoid that condition.
>
> Don't freeze :-)
Then you will have to deal with all syscalls unfrozen tasks can make.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
