On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:58:40 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:30:36 -0700
> Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [PATCH 2/2] net: make net and forcedeth to use kmalloc_node
>
> Please copy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on net patches.
>
> This patch modifies a net driver as well as the networking core. These
> subsytems have different maintainers who run different development trees.
> Consequently I must split your patch into two and change their titles and
> changelogs appropriately.
>
> Please do this for us in future, thanks.
>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> > index 42ba1c0..6d53b52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> > @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> > less_rx = np->last_rx.orig;
> >
> > while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
> > - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz +
> > NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz +
> > NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
>
> If we're going to do this then it would probably make sense to change
> dev_alloc_skb_node() so that it takes a `struct net_device *' rather than a
> bare node-id. That's a call which the net guys will need to make, which is
> why we cc them on our emails.
The driver should use netdev_alloc_skb. That routine is supposed to be overriden
on architecture's that need per node changes.
> > if (skb) {
> > np->put_rx_ctx->skb = skb;
> > np->put_rx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev,
> > @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device
> > *dev)
> > less_rx = np->last_rx.ex;
> >
> > while (np->put_rx.ex != less_rx) {
> > - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz +
> > NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb_node(np->rx_buf_sz +
> > NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
>
> It might help to edit code in an 80-col xterm.
>
> Please run scritps/checkpatch.pl across all your diffs. Its suggestions
> are by no means compulsory, but they do provide things for you to check up
> and and have a think about, thanks.
>
> I won't apply this (these) patches because I expect API changes.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
