Steven Cole wrote: [...] > Simple question here, and risking displaying great ignorance: > Does it make sense to use make -jN where N is much greater than the > number of CPUs? No, but it makes sense to have N at least one more than the number of cpus, if you have the memory. This because your processes occationally will wait for disk io, and this time may then be utilized to run the "extra" task. But don't overdo it, as you get less disk cache this way. make -j3 seems to be fastest on my 2-cpu machine with 128M ram. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12 Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-... Aaron Tiensivu
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Mike Galbraith
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Mike Galbraith
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Helge Hafting
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Mike Galbraith
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.... John Fremlin
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Alan Cox
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Zdenek Kabelac
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Gerhard Mack