On Saturday 01 September 2018 12:43 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Previously we created a controller structure per bank of GPIO pins. This
> has since been changed to one per controller, but the allocation size
> was not changed. Fix this here.
>
> This also leaves the variable 'nbank' unused, instead of removing it,
> move it down and use it to clean up a loop. For loops with multiple
> initializers and/or iteration expressions, especially ones that don't
> use those loop counters are quite hard to follow, fix this.
>
Tested for gpio interrupts on k2g and da850-lcdk
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <a...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 14d1729927d3..121a7948f785 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ davinci_gpio_get_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - int gpio, bank, i, ret = 0;
> + int bank, i, ret = 0;
> unsigned int ngpio, nbank, nirq;
> struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
> @@ -204,10 +204,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> else
> nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
>
> - nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
> - chips = devm_kcalloc(dev,
> - nbank, sizeof(struct davinci_gpio_controller),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + chips = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chips), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!chips)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -247,7 +244,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> #endif
> spin_lock_init(&chips->lock);
>
> - for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; gpio += 32, bank++)
> + nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
> + for (bank = 0; bank < nbank; bank++)
> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
>
> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips);
>
