On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:03:11PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Seems reasonable enough in principle -- but whatever you do, don't use
> "long" for it. That would definitely need different behaviour for 32-bit
> vs. 64-bit. Use explicitly sized types such as uint32_t or uint64_t.
Which is the difference in using __u32 or uint32_t? Maybe is better
defining the new struct as follow?
struct pps_timedata_s {
uint32_t sec;
uint32_t nsec;
}
or as:
struct pps_timedata_s {
__u32 sec;
__u32 nsec;
}
?
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Device Driver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
