On 9/17/18 7:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:54:54PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
From: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly,
because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place. This
corrects the issue, moving it from
Last time this was brought up we actually had realy life DTs with
the timebase-frequency under cpus and not the invidual cpu node.
Unfortunately, it still is. I hope SiFive can publish the updated
firmware with correct DT entries. I can patch BBL to fix these DT issues
until the firmware update if that's accepted.
I think we need to just document both possibilities and live with
them.
Yup. That was the intention. I will update the document/commit text to
reflect that.
Regards,
Atish
