> Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not as if it would be hard to add ioctl support to fuse. What fuse > > can't handle is the data argument of ioctl(), so the most it could do > > is give the filesystem a pid (tid) and a virtual address. The > > userspace fs could then get/put the data through /proc/<pid>/mem. > > Hork... > > Identify the generic ioctls that are relevant to a FUSE file system and > have real meaning *and* are useful.
I don't think there are any such. The point in this thread was I think about emulating an OSS sound device through a fuse fs. In that case fuse would need _generic_ ioctl support, which simply can't be done without weird userspace hacks. I'm definitely not adding specific ioctls to fuse. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
