On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:07:10PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> You're reading way too much into this. The revert is just a point to
> start the conversion. I've found that it's the best way to get the
> attention of the relevant developers. Other kind of regression
> reports have an unfortunate habit of disappearing into /dev/null.
That's some strange "logic".
You're sending a patch which has "[PATCH]" in the subject but now you
say it is not really a patch but only a way to get people's attention?!?
And nothing in it says so anywhere - it looks like an actual patch and
all.
If you do that a couple of times I'm afraid the opposite might happen -
such "patches" would get ignored completely.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
