On Thu, 2007-06-28 12:39:57 +0200, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and > > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. > > > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite. > > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have > > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you > > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_ > > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know. > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving. > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason.
Just out of interest: In which cases do you want to break threading?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for
the second : others and the world remains and is immortal. (Albert
Pine)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
