On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 04:37:40PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Pavel Machek]
> > I'd say that warning is more acceptable than #ifdef... In cases where
> > warnings can be eliminating without ifdefs, that's okay, but this...
>
> In this case it is dead weight in the object file -- and for machines
> that can least afford it (CONFIG_PCI=n is mostly for the low end,
> right?).
How about this patch? It moves the offending struct to the __init function
where it is used and inside an existing #ifdef CONFIG_PCI. This would be
up to the maintainer but since this is the only place the struct is used
I think it is acceptable to move it from the top of the file.
Comments?
--- linux-240-t12-pre8-clean/drivers/net/hp100.c Sat Nov 4 23:27:07 2000
+++ linux/drivers/net/hp100.c Mon Dec 11 21:23:12 2000
@@ -265,13 +265,6 @@
#define HP100_EISA_IDS_SIZE (sizeof(hp100_eisa_ids)/sizeof(struct hp100_eisa_id))
-static struct hp100_pci_id hp100_pci_ids[] = {
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_J2585A },
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_J2585B },
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPEX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPEX_ENET100VG4 },
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPEX2, PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPEX2_100VG }
-};
-
#define HP100_PCI_IDS_SIZE (sizeof(hp100_pci_ids)/sizeof(struct hp100_pci_id))
static int hp100_rx_ratio = HP100_DEFAULT_RX_RATIO;
@@ -335,6 +328,13 @@
int ioaddr = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
int pci_start_index = 0;
+
+ static struct hp100_pci_id hp100_pci_ids[] = {
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_J2585A },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_J2585B },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPEX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPEX_ENET100VG4 },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMPEX2, PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPEX2_100VG }
+ };
#endif
#ifdef HP100_DEBUG_B
--
Regards,
Rasmus([EMAIL PROTECTED])
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression
when you lose yours. -- Harry S. Truman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
