4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>

commit 4559b0a71749c442d34f7cfb9e72c9e58db83948 upstream.

If we're trying to make a data reservation and we have to allocate a
data chunk we could leak ret == 1, as do_chunk_alloc() will return 1 if
it allocated a chunk.  Since the end of the function is the success path
just return 0.

CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4407,7 +4407,7 @@ commit_trans:
                                      data_sinfo->flags, bytes, 1);
        spin_unlock(&data_sinfo->lock);
 
-       return ret;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode,


Reply via email to