4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rost...@goodmis.org>

[ Upstream commit 6f57ed681ed817a4ec444e83f3aa2ad695d5ef34 ]

Code that was added to force gcc not to inline any function that isn't
explicitly declared as inline uncovered that init_tick_ops() isn't
marked as "__init". It is only called by __init functions and more
importantly it too calls an __init function which would require it to be
__init as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201806060444.hdhckoby%fengguang...@intel.com

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static void __init get_tick_patch(void)
        }
 }
 
-static void init_tick_ops(struct sparc64_tick_ops *ops)
+static void __init init_tick_ops(struct sparc64_tick_ops *ops)
 {
        unsigned long freq, quotient, tick;
 


Reply via email to