4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.moduk...@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit d0eb06afe712b7b103b6361f40a9a0c638524669 ]
Alter the state-check assertion in fscache_enqueue_operation() to allow
cancelled operations to be given processing time so they can be cleaned up.
Also fix a debugging statement that was requiring such operations to have
an object assigned.
Fixes: 9ae326a69004 ("CacheFiles: A cache that backs onto a mounted filesystem")
Reported-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.moduk...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fscache/operation.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fscache/operation.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/operation.c
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ void fscache_enqueue_operation(struct fs
ASSERT(op->processor != NULL);
ASSERT(fscache_object_is_available(op->object));
ASSERTCMP(atomic_read(&op->usage), >, 0);
- ASSERTCMP(op->state, ==, FSCACHE_OP_ST_IN_PROGRESS);
+ ASSERTIFCMP(op->state != FSCACHE_OP_ST_IN_PROGRESS,
+ op->state, ==, FSCACHE_OP_ST_CANCELLED);
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_op_enqueue);
switch (op->flags & FSCACHE_OP_TYPE) {
@@ -481,7 +482,8 @@ void fscache_put_operation(struct fscach
struct fscache_cache *cache;
_enter("{OBJ%x OP%x,%d}",
- op->object->debug_id, op->debug_id, atomic_read(&op->usage));
+ op->object ? op->object->debug_id : 0,
+ op->debug_id, atomic_read(&op->usage));
ASSERTCMP(atomic_read(&op->usage), >, 0);
