4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>

[ Upstream commit 5cf3006cc81d9aa09a10aa781fc065546b12919d ]

I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings,
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case:

The code definitely looks like a break is missing here.
However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT,
nor do I actually know what might be :)
So please use this patch with caution and only if you are
able to do some testing.

Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>
[johannes: looks obvious enough to apply as is, interesting
 though that it never seems to have been a problem]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/wireless/nl80211.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -3578,6 +3578,7 @@ static int parse_station_flags(struct ge
                params->sta_flags_mask = BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED) |
                                         BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP) |
                                         BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED);
+               break;
        default:
                return -EINVAL;
        }


Reply via email to