> > So the answer is "yes" we should then, and move from pci_get_bus_and_slot > > to pci_get_bus_domain_and_slot() [or just add an argument]. The point of > > the functions is to be easy to use, so it should be handled internally. > > My point was that code which doesn't currently keep the bus pointer to > hand should keep the bus pointer to hand instead of the bus number. > That's easier to use, particularly if you want to actually do any pci > config accesses.
If you've got the bus pointer yes. If you don't then teaching pci_get_bus_and_slot() to handle it makes sense. Another problem here - which bus has the legacy decode mappings ? That will matter for ATA which also uses pci_get_bus_and_slot... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
