On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 01:11:47 -0700
Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com> wrote:
> The return value of text_poke() is meaningless - it is one of the
> function inputs. One day someone may allow the callers to deal with
> text_poke() failures, if those actually happen.
>
> In the meanwhile, remove the return value.
>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> index ffe7902cc326..1f73f71b4de2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void
> *opcode, size_t len);
> * On the local CPU you need to be protected again NMI or MCE handlers
> seeing an
> * inconsistent instruction while you patch.
> */
> -extern void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
> +extern void text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
> extern int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void
> *handler);
> extern int after_bootmem;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index 0feac3dfabe9..45b7fdeaed90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void text_poke_safe(void *addr, const void
> *opcode, size_t len,
> *
> * Note: Must be called under text_mutex.
> */
> -void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> +void text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> {
> bool cross_page_boundary = offset_in_page(addr) + len > PAGE_SIZE;
> struct page *pages[2] = {0};
Could you also remove "return addr;" in this patch ?
Thank you,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
