Hi,

On 27.08.2018 11:33, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:42:09PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
>> index fc832676a798..e71d46cb01cc 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
>> @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ void __weak auxtrace_mmap_params__set_idx(struct 
>> auxtrace_mmap_params *mp __mayb
>>  
>>  void perf_mmap__munmap(struct perf_mmap *map)
>>  {
>> +    if (map->data != NULL) {
>> +            munmap(map->data, perf_mmap__mmap_len(map));
>> +            map->data = NULL;
>> +    }
>>      if (map->base != NULL) {
>>              munmap(map->base, perf_mmap__mmap_len(map));
>>              map->base = NULL;
>> @@ -190,6 +194,14 @@ int perf_mmap__mmap(struct perf_mmap *map, struct 
>> mmap_params *mp, int fd)
>>              map->base = NULL;
>>              return -1;
>>      }
>> +    map->data = mmap(NULL, perf_mmap__mmap_len(map), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> +                    MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> 
> hum, why does map->data need to be mmap-ed?

The same way as for kernel buffers. If you see better alternatives it could be 
applied.

> 
> jirka
> 

Reply via email to