Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes:
> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not
> used [-Werror=unused-label]
>
> Fixes: fb5841091f28 ("apparmor: remove no-op permission check in
> policy_unpack")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> index 3647b5834ace..96d8cf68ce65 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,6 @@ static struct aa_dfa *unpack_dfa(struct aa_ext *e)
>
> return dfa;
>
> -fail:
> aa_put_dfa(dfa);
> return ERR_PTR(-EPROTO);
> }
Shouldn't the two lines after the label be removed as well? IIUC they're
unreachable now.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
