[PATCH 4.9 109/130] drm/nouveau/gem: off by one bugs in nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

[ Upstream commit 7f073d011f93e92d4d225526b9ab6b8b0bbd6613 ]

The bo array has req->nr_buffers elements so the > should be >= so we
don't read beyond the end of the array.

Fixes: a1606a9596e5 ("drm/nouveau: new gem pushbuf interface, bump to 0.0.16")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n
                struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
                uint32_t data;
 
-               if (unlikely(r->bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) {
+               if (unlikely(r->bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) {
                        NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc bo index invalid\n");
                        ret = -EINVAL;
                        break;
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n
                if (b->presumed.valid)
                        continue;
 
-               if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) {
+               if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) {
                        NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc container bo index 
invalid\n");
                        ret = -EINVAL;
                        break;