4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit ee6581ceba7f8314b81b2f2a81f1cf3f67c679e2 ]

Incremental patch to fix the unchecked dereference in acpi_nfit_ctl.
Reported by Dan Carpenter:

"acpi/nfit: fix cmd_rc for acpi_nfit_ctl to
always return a value" from Jun 28, 2018, leads to the following
Smatch complaint:

    drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c:578 acpi_nfit_ctl()
     warn: variable dereferenced before check 'cmd_rc' (see line 411)

drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
   410
   411          *cmd_rc = -EINVAL;
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Patch adds unchecked dereference.

Fixes: c1985cefd844 ("acpi/nfit: fix cmd_rc for acpi_nfit_ctl to always return 
a value")

Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ int acpi_nfit_ctl(struct nvdimm_bus_desc
        const u8 *uuid;
        int rc, i;
 
-       *cmd_rc = -EINVAL;
+       if (cmd_rc)
+               *cmd_rc = -EINVAL;
        func = cmd;
        if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL) {
                call_pkg = buf;
@@ -289,7 +290,8 @@ int acpi_nfit_ctl(struct nvdimm_bus_desc
                 * If we return an error (like elsewhere) then caller wouldn't
                 * be able to rely upon data returned to make calculation.
                 */
-               *cmd_rc = 0;
+               if (cmd_rc)
+                       *cmd_rc = 0;
                return 0;
        }
 


Reply via email to