On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 06:16 +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > I think that could work, but at the point making a separate > compiler-common.h and not including compiler-gcc.h for clang sounds > better to me... More importantly here, either solution sound complex > enough to require more than a few days and proper testing for all archs > etc when compared to the partial revert we have here.
The immediate need for a partial revert seems unnecessary as clang hasn't really worked for a couple releases now. The separate compiler file changes are much more sensible, even if it takes a few days.
