On Monday 25 June 2007 21:09, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:34:48 +0200 > > Bj__rn Steinbrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being > > probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled. > > So... what's the status of this lot? > > I've just merged this patch and the second one: > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel > PerfMon NMI watchdog Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > but there was no followup discussion afaict. > > Andi, Stephane: acks?
Yes, although I'm still a little uneasy about the always probe one. > If acked, do we agree that this is 2.6.22 material? The first (always probe) is probably .22 material, but needs more testing first. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
