On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 07:39:33PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > I'm quite happy with this approach for 2.6.23-rc, along with your ARM > > dma_map patch which (if I understood aright) rmk approved. > > I didn't approve it. Please re-read my reply - there are still some > unanswered questions in it which _really_ need answering.
Sorry for misrepresenting you. > The report talks about the AT91 machines. These machines do not have > cache coherent DMA. Therefore, the code being patched should be > optimised away by the compiler. *Or* we have even bigger problems. > > Please forward the original problem report. Done. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
