On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:35:27PM -0700, skan...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-07-24 05:25, Quentin Perret wrote:
> If it's going to be a different aggregation from what's done for frequency
> guidance, I don't see the point of having this inside schedutil. Why not
> keep it inside the scheduler files? Also, it seems weird to use a governor's
> code when it might not actually be in use. What if someone is using
> ondemand, conservative, performance, etc?
EAS hard relies on schedutil -- I suppose we need a check for that
somewhere and maybe some infrastructure to pin the cpufreq governor.
We're simply not going to support it for anything else.
> > +enum schedutil_type {
> > + frequency_util,
> > + energy_util,
> > +};
>
> Please don't use lower case for enums. It's extremely confusing.
How is that confusing?
