In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "No break" with a
proper "Fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index ad45761..a307b00 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -3739,7 +3739,7 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry
*opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
*/
final = &smack_known_star;
/*
- * No break.
+ * Fall through.
*
* If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
* but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity
--
2.7.4
