> Is it "obvious" that I'm dealing with the same or similar kind of > bugginess here? Obvious no, but its a pretty good guess. > > That being the case, any reason I can't/shouldn't put in a function > similar to apm_battery_horked(), and call/run it based on a config-time > variable? None at all > FWIW, the machine claims "Phoenix NoteBIOS" dated 1994, and the poweroff > bit of APM appears to work just fine. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/a... Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /pr... Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /pr... Neale Banks
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /pr... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /pr... Neale Banks