On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:12:46 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:32:59PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > However since it's not supposed to be providing any DMA a CPU DAI really > > > shouldn't be doing this... > > > Well, if so, the CPU dai also cannot get the exact base delay > > corresponding to the reported position, either, no? > > It can know how much delay it's adding internally between its input and > output, which feeds into the overall delay experienced by the user.
But isn't it merely the additional delay that should be applied on top of the existing runtime->delay? Takashi
