Hi Peter, On 31/07/18 13:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Aside from the first patch, which I posted the change on, I've picked up > until 10. I think that other SD_ASYM patch-set replaces 11 and 12, > right? > 11 is no longer needed, but AFAICT we still need 12 - we don't want PREFER_SIBLING to interfere with asymmetric systems.
Also, I've been playing around with a patch to modify 5 (the nohz kicks) that first scans the capacity of nohz CPUs before doing any kick (pretty much like what asym packing is doing with nohz CPU priority), do you want me to toss it your way? I haven't done run any tests with it yet... Cheers, Valentin
