On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 11:44 +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:18 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > wait_for_completion_timeout returns unsigned long not int so an
> > appropriate
> > variable is declared and the assignment and check fixed up.
> > 
> 
> Patch looks good.
> 
> Thanks for this

[ I forgot to add this ]

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com>


> 
> Alex
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hof...@osadl.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > found by experimental coccinelle script
> > 
> > As the timeout returned is always << INT_MAX there is no side-effect
> > with
> > the
> > type conversion here, never the less proper types should be used.
> > 
> > Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_SPI=y,
> > CONFIG_IIO=y,
> > CONFIG_AD7793=y (implies CONFIG_AD_SIGMA_DELTA=y)
> > 
> > Patch is against 4.18-rc5 (localversion-next is next-20180720)
> > 
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> > b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> > index cf1b048..fc95107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> > @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ static int ad_sd_calibrate(struct ad_sigma_delta
> > *sigma_delta,
> >     unsigned int mode, unsigned int channel)
> >  {
> >     int ret;
> > +   unsigned long timeout;
> >  
> >     ret = ad_sigma_delta_set_channel(sigma_delta, channel);
> >     if (ret)
> > @@ -224,8 +225,8 @@ static int ad_sd_calibrate(struct ad_sigma_delta
> > *sigma_delta,
> >  
> >     sigma_delta->irq_dis = false;
> >     enable_irq(sigma_delta->spi->irq);
> > -   ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sigma_delta->completion,
> > 2*HZ);
> > -   if (ret == 0) {
> > +   timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sigma_delta-
> > >completion,
> > 2 * HZ);
> > +   if (timeout == 0) {
> >             sigma_delta->irq_dis = true;
> >             disable_irq_nosync(sigma_delta->spi->irq);
> >             ret =
> > -EIO;N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{��*"��^n�r���z���h����&���G��
> > �h�(�階�ݢj"���m�����z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�

Reply via email to