Bjorn, You have the following registers to consider (for P4/Core):
#define MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE 0x000003f1 #define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 0x00000309 #define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR1 0x0000030a #define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR2 0x0000030b #define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL 0x0000038d #define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS 0x0000038e #define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL 0x0000038f #define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL 0x00000390 With Barcelona, you'll also have to consider: #define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHCTL 0xc0011030 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHLINAD 0xc0011031 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHPHYSAD 0xc0011032 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSOPCTL 0xc0011033 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSOPRIP 0xc0011034 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSOPDATA 0xc0011035 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSOPDATA2 0xc0011036 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSOPDATA3 0xc0011037 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSDCLINAD 0xc0011038 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSDCPHYSAD 0xc0011039 #define MSR_AMD64_IBSCTL 0xc001103A I think you could organize by groups with a bitmap per group and some sorted linked list to keep track of all of them. On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:13:54AM +0200, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > On 2007.06.21 01:36:45 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > Bjorn, > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:59:33PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > Bjorn, > > > > > > I ran into one issue related with the new allocator. > > Should be the same with 2.6.21 and earlier, the "new" allocator should > do exactly the samething, it just fixes the breakage introduced in the > post-2.6.21 cleanup. > > > > In the case of a Core 2 Duo processor, the PMU implements more > > > than just basic counters. In particular it supports fixed counters > > > and PEBS where both use another set of MSRs. Those are not within > > > a 66 bit distance from MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVNTSEL0. Thus the allocator > > > fails with an assertion. > > How far away are they? > > > > > > > I do know that perfmon is the only consumer of those extended > > > features TODAY. Yet I think we need to define the allocator such > > > that it can work with other "distant" MSRs as well. > > > > > > > I think that a workaround for this issue could be for the allocator > > to grant the requests for registers outside of the range, i.e., register > > that it does not see/manage. > > That would also allow multiple subsystems to use them at the same time. > And whoever adds the second user of those MSRs might not be aware of the > just-grant-it policy of the allocator. And bugs that arise due to such > problems will probably become a real PITA to track down. > > Unfortunately, I don't see any elegant solution to this atm, and of > course making your code simply circumvent the allocator isn't an option > either. > > Thanks, > Björn > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > oprofile-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list -- -Stephane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/