On Jun 21, 2007, "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's this simple, those who chose the GPLv2 for Linux and their > contributions to it don't want people to create derivative works of their > works that can't be Tivoized. Do you agree that if there's any single contributor who thinks it can't be tivoized, and he manages his opinion to prevail in court against a copyright holder, then it can't? That this is the same privilege to veto additional permissions that Al Viro has just claimed? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/293 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/354 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/117 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/432 -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
