On 7/16/2018 11:07 AM, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:


On 07/16/2018 10:29 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:


On 7/15/2018 6:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.miz...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.miz...@jp.fujitsu.com>

commit 15a3e845b01c ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix SBOX support for
Broadwell CPUs") introduced PCU.3 for Broadwell CPU. Unfortunately,
the driver_data of PCU.3 conflicts to QPI Port 2 filter.

      { /* QPI Port 2 filter  */
              PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f46),
              .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV, 2),

      { /* PCU.3 (for Capability registers) */
              PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0),
              .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
                                                 HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3),
                               // HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3 == 2

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1030,6 +1030,7 @@ enum {
       SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT0_FILTER,
       SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT1_FILTER,
       HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3,
+    BDX_PCI_PCU_3,
   };

So we use a magic '2' enumerator in the 'QPI Port 2 filter', and that overlaps
with HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3, right?

Shouldn't we clean up all the enumerators and not use magic numbers, and this 
fix
the conflict?


Yes, it should fix the conflict. I will clean up the code.

Thanks a lot!
I would appreciate if you could add CC to me when you post the patch.


Here is the patch.

Masa, could you please give it a try?

Thanks,
Kan

From 688378a4003ec33156958a52dc822105c18075af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 04:57:51 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcode index of Broadwell extra PCI DEV

Masa reports that a warning message is shown while CPU hot-removing on
Broadwell server.

  WARNING: CPU: 126 PID: 6 at arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c:988
  uncore_pci_remove+0x10b/0x150
  Call Trace:
   pci_device_remove+0x42/0xd0
   device_release_driver_internal+0x148/0x220
   pci_stop_bus_device+0x76/0xa0
   pci_stop_root_bus+0x44/0x60
   acpi_pci_root_remove+0x1f/0x80
   acpi_bus_trim+0x57/0x90
   acpi_bus_trim+0x2e/0x90
   acpi_device_hotplug+0x2bc/0x4b0
   acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30
   process_one_work+0x174/0x3a0
   worker_thread+0x4c/0x3d0
   kthread+0xf8/0x130

This bug was introduced in:

  commit 15a3e845b01c ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix SBOX support for
Broadwell CPUs")

The index of "QPI Port 2 filter" was hardcode to 2. The index of
"PCU.3" used enumerator "HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3", which equals to 2 as well.

To fix the conflict, the hardcode index needs to be cleaned up.
Introduce a new enumerator "BDX_PCI_QPI_PORT2_FILTER" for "QPI Port 2
filter" on Broadwell, and increase the UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX.
Clean up hardcode index.

Reported-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.miz...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 15a3e845b01c ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix SBOX support for
Broadwell CPUs")
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h       |  2 +-
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 10 +++++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index c9e1e0b..e17ab88 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 #define UNCORE_PCI_DEV_TYPE(data)      ((data >> 8) & 0xff)
 #define UNCORE_PCI_DEV_IDX(data)       (data & 0xff)
 #define UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV           0xff
-#define UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX       3
+#define UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX       4

 #define UNCORE_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, 0xff)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 87dc026..51d7c11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ void snbep_uncore_cpu_init(void)
 enum {
        SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT0_FILTER,
        SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT1_FILTER,
+       BDX_PCI_QPI_PORT2_FILTER,
        HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3,
 };

@@ -3286,15 +3287,18 @@ static const struct pci_device_id bdx_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
        },
        { /* QPI Port 0 filter  */
                PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f86),
-               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV, 0),
+               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
+                                                  SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT0_FILTER),
        },
        { /* QPI Port 1 filter  */
                PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f96),
-               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV, 1),
+               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
+                                                  SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT1_FILTER),
        },
        { /* QPI Port 2 filter  */
                PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f46),
-               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV, 2),
+               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
+                                                  BDX_PCI_QPI_PORT2_FILTER),
        },
        { /* PCU.3 (for Capability registers) */
                PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0),
--
2.4.11


Reply via email to