* Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:36:07AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> In many cases, it would be useful to be able to use the full
> >> sanity-checked refcount helpers regardless of CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL, as
> >> this would help to avoid duplicate warnings where callers try to
> >> sanity-check refcount manipulation.
> >>
> >> This patch refactors things such that the full refcount helpers were
> >> always built, as refcount_${op}_checked(), such that they can be used
> >> regardless of CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL. This will allow code which *always*
> >> wants a checked refcount to opt-in, avoiding the need to duplicate the
> >> logic for warnings.
> >>
> >> There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
> >> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> >> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  include/linux/refcount.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  lib/refcount.c           | 53 
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > Looks good to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> 
> Peter, Ingo, can this go via the atomics tree? That's been the
> traditional location for the refcount patches.

Sure, will have a look tomorrow!

        Ingo

Reply via email to