On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:53:15PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>>So we could remove the "#define _GNU_SOURCE" at the top
> >>>>of scripts/kallsyms.c too, presumably? If not (i.e. if there are
> >>>>more GNUisms left in that file anyway), then I'm not sure if we
> >>>>really gain by the change.
> >>>yes, i believe this is true
> >>
> >>I only tried in on x86 with my toolchain and it works, but I don't
> >>know if it is worth the risk of breaking someone's setup for virtually
> >>no gain...
> >
> >With the memmem() removed, the code builds (and works)
> >fine on several non-GNU systems. It should be perfectly
> >safe to remove the _GNU_SOURCE.
>
> You're right. I went back in history and it was me who introduced the
> _GNU_SOURCE when I added the memmem too (shame on me). So, if it worked
> fine before, there is no reason to not work now that memmem is removed.
>
> So I can:
>
> - send an incremental patch with just that line removed
>
> - send a replacement patch
>
> - just leave it for now and wait until I work on kallsyms again to
> silently remove that line together with other changes
>
> Andrew, what would you prefer?
Please send a replacement patch to me.
I will carry it in the kbuild tree.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
