On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:44:57PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 10:12:14 +1000 > Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have mixed feelings about this patch, I am Ok with this patch but I > > > suggest its sent with the follow-up patch that shows its use of this. > > > And also appreciate if such a follow-up patch is rebased onto the IRQ > > > tracepoint work: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10373129/ > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I'll try to dig it up and resend. Thanks for the feedback on it. > > Joel, > > With your latest patches, is this obsolete?
Yes, that's right. This patch isn't needed for what I was doing (improving the performance of the irq disable/enable path). I didn't see any performance improvement with this patch. Instead, the patches in my series use SRCU to improve the performance of the tracepoints. thanks, - Joel
