On Jun 19, 2007, Hans-Jürgen Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Let's just hope it never is, or that some influx of >> >> long-sighted comes in >> >> > Kernel programmers are short-sighted? What kind of arrogance is that? >> >> It's just stating the obvious. The upgrade path is a nightmare.
> Well, maybe. Maybe this is a topic that needs further discussion. > But I don't find it very important as we're not in a situation where > we urgently need a new license. Agreed. It could have been discussed years ago, when the clarification on GPLv2-only came up, but it's still not urgent, and hopefully it never will be. It wouldn't be a bad idea to think about it, though. Just in case it's not clear, this is in no way related with GPLv3. It's just that GPLv3 discussions appear to get more people thinking about relicensing, and then the "impossibilities" of doing it come up. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
