On Jun 19, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> Once again, now with clearer starting conditions (not intended to >> match TiVo in any way, BTW; don't get into that distraction) >> >> >> Vendor doesn't care about tivoizing, their business works the same >> either way. >> >> Vendor's employees will contribute the same, one way or another, so >> their contributions are out of the equation.
> no, this is what you are missing. No, this is just one of many possible situations. You're just thinking of a different scenario, in which tivoization is important for the tivoizer. We'll get to that. Please be patient. Don't get the illusion that you're disputing or weakening the argument with these statements. Disputing premises of a logical inference is pointless as far as disputing a larger argument that this particular lemma would be a part of. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
