On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On 6/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We use the parameter formerly used by the destructor to pass an optional
> > pointer to a kmem_cache_ops structure to kmem_cache_create.
> > 
> > kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops.
> 
> I like kmem_cache_ops but I don't like this patch. I know its painful
> but we really want the introduction patch to fixup the API (move ctor
> to kmem_cache_ops and do the callers).

That can be done later. The effort does not increase because of this 
patch. If you have the time please do such a patch.

 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to