* Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [180611 07:06]: > * Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com> [180611 06:48]: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com> [180611 06:28]: > > >> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what > > >> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same > > >> function would work well enough> > > > Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both > > > syss and sysc reset. > > > > > > > > > In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it > > being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be > > added. What do you think? > > Sure makes sense to me. > > > As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were > > originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask > > saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using > > SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many > > different sysconfig types we have. > > Sure we could have a macro for that.
So what's the conclusion on this one? Are you going to do one more version of the ti-sysc driver patch? Regards, Tony
