Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 11:25:09 +0100 From: Roberto Fichera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Why we couldn't use atomic_inc(&mm->rss) here and below, avoiding to wrap the inc with a spin_lock()/spin_unlock() ? atomic_t does not guarentee a large enough range necessary for mm->rss Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_table_lock h... Rasmus Andersen
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_tab... Mark Hahn
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page_tab... Roberto Fichera
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page... Rasmus Andersen
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without page... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified without ... Roberto Fichera
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified with... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified... Roberto Fichera
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modi... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is ... Roberto Fichera
- Re: [PATCH] mm->rss is modified... Albert D. Cahalan