4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@arm.com>

commit 0fe42512b2f03f9e5a20b9f55ef1013a68b4cd48 upstream.

Commit 17c2895 ("arm64: Abstract syscallno manipulation") abstracts
out the pt_regs.syscallno value for a syscall cancelled by a tracer
as NO_SYSCALL, and provides helpers to set and check for this
condition.  However, the way this was implemented has the
unintended side-effect of disabling part of the syscall restart
logic.

This comes about because the second in_syscall() check in
do_signal() re-evaluates the "in a syscall" condition based on the
updated pt_regs instead of the original pt_regs.  forget_syscall()
is explicitly called prior to the second check in order to prevent
restart logic in the ret_to_user path being spuriously triggered,
which means that the second in_syscall() check always yields false.

This triggers a failure in
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c, when using ptrace to
suppress a signal that interrups a nanosleep() syscall.

Misbehaviour of this type is only expected in the case where a
tracer suppresses a signal and the target process is either being
single-stepped or the interrupted syscall attempts to restart via
-ERESTARTBLOCK.

This patch restores the old behaviour by performing the
in_syscall() check only once at the start of the function.

Fixes: 17c289586009 ("arm64: Abstract syscallno manipulation")
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@arm.com>
Reported-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x-
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -830,11 +830,12 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *re
        unsigned long continue_addr = 0, restart_addr = 0;
        int retval = 0;
        struct ksignal ksig;
+       bool syscall = in_syscall(regs);
 
        /*
         * If we were from a system call, check for system call restarting...
         */
-       if (in_syscall(regs)) {
+       if (syscall) {
                continue_addr = regs->pc;
                restart_addr = continue_addr - (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 
4);
                retval = regs->regs[0];
@@ -886,7 +887,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *re
         * Handle restarting a different system call. As above, if a debugger
         * has chosen to restart at a different PC, ignore the restart.
         */
-       if (in_syscall(regs) && regs->pc == restart_addr) {
+       if (syscall && regs->pc == restart_addr) {
                if (retval == -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK)
                        setup_restart_syscall(regs);
                user_rewind_single_step(current);


Reply via email to