4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

commit dd27b87ab5fcf3ea1c060b5e3ab5d31cc78e9f4c upstream.

On some platforms, overflows will clear before MTC wraparound, and there
is no following TSC/TMA packet. In that case the previous TMA is valid.
Since there will be a valid TMA either way, stop setting 'have_tma' to
false upon overflow.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527762225-26024-4-git-send-email-adrian.hun...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -1376,7 +1376,6 @@ static int intel_pt_overflow(struct inte
 {
        intel_pt_log("ERROR: Buffer overflow\n");
        intel_pt_clear_tx_flags(decoder);
-       decoder->have_tma = false;
        decoder->cbr = 0;
        decoder->timestamp_insn_cnt = 0;
        decoder->pkt_state = INTEL_PT_STATE_ERR_RESYNC;


Reply via email to