4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>

commit 1eb9364ce81d9445ad6f9d44921a91d2a6597156 upstream.

During disassociation the ucontext will become NULL, however due to how
the SRCU locking works the ucontext must only be examined after looking
at the ib_dev, which governs the RCU control flow.

With the wrong ordering userspace will see EINVAL instead of EIO for a
disassociated uverbs FD, which breaks rdma-core.

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 491d5c6a3023 ("RDMA/uverbs: Move uncontext check before SRCU read lock")
Reported-by: Mark Bloch <ma...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
@@ -734,10 +734,6 @@ static ssize_t ib_uverbs_write(struct fi
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-       if (!file->ucontext &&
-           (command != IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_GET_CONTEXT || extended))
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        if (extended) {
                if (count < (sizeof(hdr) + sizeof(ex_hdr)))
                        return -EINVAL;
@@ -757,6 +753,16 @@ static ssize_t ib_uverbs_write(struct fi
                goto out;
        }
 
+       /*
+        * Must be after the ib_dev check, as once the RCU clears ib_dev ==
+        * NULL means ucontext == NULL
+        */
+       if (!file->ucontext &&
+           (command != IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_GET_CONTEXT || extended)) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
        if (!verify_command_mask(ib_dev, command, extended)) {
                ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
                goto out;


Reply via email to