On Jun 18, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > do you realize that redhat uses checksums or signatures to check the > validity of their CD's?
Yes. How does this stop the users from enjoying any of the freedoms? > I seriously doubt if redhat tells you how to how to generate such a > checksum/signature. Mixing two different issues here. The checksums embedded in the ISO images are implemented in anaconda itself, provided along with the distro, so anyone can generate them, even though I don't know the precise algorithm. The checksums over the ISO images themselves are implemented with sha1sum (earlier, md5sum), so anyone can generate them too. As for the GPG signatures in the RPMs and in the SHA1SUM file, these are indeed generated using public algorithms but private keys. But these signatures are not functional, and they don't in any way stop anyone from enjoying freedoms. > in addition to the problem that Linus points out about being unable to > change the contents of the write-only CD this would seem to conflict > with what you are claiming the GPL is supposed to allow. It looks like you read only Linus' messages, not my responses. A write-only CD is like ROM. It's not the distributor who's imposing restrictions on its modification. Nobody can modify it because nature says so. It's not like the software is being recorded in a CD as a means to prevent you from modifying it. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
