On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:54:18AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The nodes-level domain looks for internode balances between up to 16 
> > nodes. It is not restricted to a single node.
> 
> I was mostly speaking with the example system in mind (4-node 4-cpu
> box), but yes, node-level domain does look for imbalance across max 16
> nodes as you mention.
> 
> Both node and all-node domains don't have SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE set, which
> means idle_balance() will stop looking for imbalance beyonds its own
> node. Based on the observed balance within its own node, IMO,
> idle_balance() should not cause ->next_balance to be reset.

I think the check in idle_balance needs to be modified.

If the domain *does not* have SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE set then
next_balance must still be set right. Does this patch fix it?



Scheduler: Fix next_interval determination in idle_balance().

The intervals of domains that do not have SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE must
be considered for the calculation of the time of the next balance. 
Otherwise we may defer rebalancing forever.

Signed-off-by: Christop Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/sched.c    2007-06-18 10:56:31.000000000 
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/sched.c 2007-06-18 10:57:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -2493,17 +2493,16 @@ static void idle_balance(int this_cpu, s
        unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + 60 *  HZ;
 
        for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
-               if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
+               if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE)
                        /* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */
                        pulled_task = load_balance_newidle(this_cpu,
                                                        this_rq, sd);
-                       if (time_after(next_balance,
-                                 sd->last_balance + sd->balance_interval))
-                               next_balance = sd->last_balance
-                                               + sd->balance_interval;
-                       if (pulled_task)
-                               break;
-               }
+               if (time_after(next_balance,
+                         sd->last_balance + sd->balance_interval))
+                       next_balance = sd->last_balance
+                                       + sd->balance_interval;
+               if (pulled_task)
+                       break;
        }
        if (!pulled_task)
                /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to