On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:25:17PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Allow sched_clock() to be used before schec_clock_init() and
> sched_clock_init_late() are called. This provides us with a way to get
> early boot timestamps on machines with unstable clocks.

There are !x86 architectures that use this code and might not expect to
have their sched_clock() called quite that early. Please verify.

> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatas...@oracle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/clock.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> index 10c83e73837a..f034392b0f6c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
>   */
>  static int __init sched_clock_init_late(void)
>  {
> +     /* Transition to unstable clock from early clock */

This is wrong... or at least it smells horribly.

This is not the point where we transition from early to unstable, that
is in fact in sched_clock_init.

This function, sched_clock_init_late(), is where we attempt to
transition from unstable to stable. And this is _waaaay_ after SMP init.

> +     local_irq_disable();
> +     __gtod_offset = sched_clock() + __sched_clock_offset - ktime_get_ns();
> +     local_irq_enable();

This might work in sched_clock_init(), which is pre-SMP.

>       sched_clock_running = 2;
>       /*
>        * Ensure that it is impossible to not do a static_key update.
> @@ -350,8 +355,9 @@ u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu)
>       if (sched_clock_stable())
>               return sched_clock() + __sched_clock_offset;
>  
> -     if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
> -             return 0ull;
> +     /* Use early clock until sched_clock_init_late() */
> +     if (unlikely(sched_clock_running < 2))
> +             return sched_clock() + __sched_clock_offset;

And then this remains !sched_clock_running, except instead of 0, you
then return sched_clock() + __sched_clock_offset;

>       preempt_disable_notrace();
>       scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);


Reply via email to