On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:59:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Aside of that the spec says:
> > >
> > > 31 Disable LOCK# assertion for split locked access.
> > >
> > > Can you pretty please make sure that this bit enforces #AC enable? If 31
> > > is
> > > ever set and such an access happens then the resulting havoc will takes
> > > ages to decode.
> > >
> > > That bit is also mentioned in the SDM with ZERO explanation why it exists
> > > in the first place and why anyone would ever enable it and without a big
> > > fat warning about the possible consequences. Can this pretty please be
> > > fixed?
> >
> > The bit 31 already exits on all processors. Hardware always sets its value
> > as zero after power on. It has been legacy for 20 years. It was added for
> > one customer 20 years ago. Now Intel hardware design team doesn't expect
> > anyone to set the bit.
>
> Doesn't expect. ROTFL.
>
> That's the most stupiest excuse for not adding a big fat warning into the
> SDM why this abomination should never be used at all.
>
> Aside of that does the Intel hardware design team expect that this one
> customer is still depending on this nonsense and is therefore proliferating
> it forever?
Forgot to add that there are a lot of things nobody expects to be done, but
especially BIOS/SMM people have a tendency to flip random bits as they see
fit. Maybe not this one, but only for the reason that they did not notice
it yet.
Thanks,
tglx
