Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 18/06/07, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each > > > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than > > > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in > > > > their processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a > > > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or > > > > team) to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about. > > > > > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer > > > about importance of the code review and proper recognition of > > > reviewers. > > > > That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions. > > Are you a volunteer?
Probably not, as this task requires a real PRO! > It's not an easy task, there are more patches than regressions. I didn't say it was an easy task, and it probably involves a lot of stamina. But the management aspect looks rather straight forward, yet rewarding. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
