Carlo Wood wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:18:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> where n is a number that needs to be determined (I think that n could be 3). >> Well, "negative comments" should also be defined more precisely. ;-) > > I think that n should be a function of the number of accepted patches > that this person sent in before, and the number of regressions he > caused in the past.
The character of the patch (potential impacts, size...) and availability of reviewers and testers influence the required review time so much that other factors, like reputation of the submitter, hardly matter. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -==- =---= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
